Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jerry Schulz's avatar

In the October 6 Journal Sentinel, the president of the MTEA demanded an end to Choice, while Choice advocates defended the program. This argument has been going on for decades.

Colleston has done a good job of pointing out the flaws in the MTEA’s argument. And of course, the MTEA largely runs MPS, and so this is also the stance of the Board.

But there is something more basic that is wrong here.

First, getting rid of Choice simply isn’t going to happen. The parents of the over 28,000 Choice students will furiously fight any attempt to shut down their kids’ schools. And other powerful political forces will line up alongside them.

And, clinging to the belief that the way to “fix” our MPS schools is to get rid of Choice distracts us from doing something that might really work—to seize this moment to imagine and put in place a much better system to give our kids the learning experience they deserve.

We can rethink how to bring about better pedagogy, move to personalized learning, ensure engagement of all our families and kids, improve the teacher pipeline, and build stronger community-based schools.

What if we all worked together to give our kids a system that would be not just better but the BEST in the country, a model for everyone else?

Just a dream? Well, we can try. Our kids deserve this.

I am an MPS alumnus (Riverside) and a retired MPS employee, having worked in the technology area. I am also a former K-8 teacher in another system, where I was a union member.

Expand full comment

No posts